27563个字。这里’s the latest (第34章起)。一世’我希望到明年底能达到30,000大关。这将使我得到一个不错的整数,目标是在最后两周每周达到10,000个字。

I’我喜欢现在有两个故事情节交织在一起。一方面,Declan Atomz现在开始了解外星世界。它’看看这个角色走了多远(成长?)会很有趣。最近介绍的另一个故事情节是关于Dave Darwin及其社交软件公司“Social Kinetics”. I think I’我们提出了一种新型的社交软件(因为它处理多媒体’t surprise me if 马克·坎特 已经做到了)。这里’是我小说中的描述–但是要获得全貌,你’ll have to 阅读其余内容 ðŸ〜‰

今天是戴夫(Dave)向全世界宣布Social-Kinetic的新社交软件产品的日子。产品只是以公司名称命名–ÃSocialKinetics®– 和 it was made up of three main ingredients: firstly it was an online community space on the 网页, which was like other online communities. That is, it was a website with a URL (web address) 和, in order to use the website, people were required to sign-up 和 register an account. The second main ingredient was the personality assessment 和 physical body mapping. Once a person had registered to become a member of theÃSocialKinetics®community, that person would fill in a questionnaire to establish the basic parameters of their personality. This was a very superficial personality type, similar to Myers-Briggs. 社会动力学 had 50 initial ìtypesî (eventually the number of types would number in the hundreds). The person would also have a ìmappingî done of their face 和 body, so as to approximate their physical appearance in the avatar. The software 和 management team had decided on the following policy: people must use mappings of their own person as a base for their avatars. This decision was driven by Daveís philosophy that people should not be able to ìhideî behind an avatar. The principle of ìWhat you see is what you getî should apply, so that people learned to trust one another 和 be honest with their interactions in the community. Dave felt that if people could select a graphical online persona like in previous examples of virtual worlds –一个巫师,一条狗或一个绿色的两头外星人±,那么那只会助长其他的虚假事实。社会动力学的目的是鼓励人们通过化身来扩展自己–结识新朋友,建立新的联系。戴夫(Dave)认为,决定他的软件成功的一个重要因素是,化身应尽可能接近其人类主人–不仅是个性,还应是身体上的相似。第三个要素是头像软件本身。一旦分配了个性并映射了身体特征,就将为客户提供化身。那时,化身将加入社区,并同时通过收集和汇总有关其所有者的数据开始建立自己的身份。

附言我想念我的博客!现在,博客世界中发生了一些真正有趣的事情。尤其 戴夫·温纳’s new 类别-based blog design. His use of categories is not quite the same as 话题s that 电子载体菲尔·皮尔森 是做。但它’真该死。我在一些评论中建议’d be great to add a “topic”标记为RSS2.0规范。这将是“item” tag, just like the “category”标签(Dave使用的标签)。我同意 保罗马克 那一个“category” is different to “topic”,但实际上它们是免费的。戴夫’s use of categories seems to give more scope for heirarchic organisation, while using 话题s gives a flatter 和 (IMHO) more flexible organisation. It’看看它是如何发展的,将会很有趣。无论如何,所有这些都激发了我的下一个项目构想–重新设计我自己的博客! 12月ðŸ〜‰

P.P.S.如果你’re wondering, 这里’s Nanowrimo的描述.

P.P.P.S.全力以赴!!!